Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The outcome of the reaction of metallo-2-nitro-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrins with oxyanions is dependent both on the nature of the coordinated metal ion and on the reaction temperature. Metallo-2-nitro-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrins with relatively electronegative chelated metal ions (CuII, NiII and FeIIICl)react with methoxide ion in N,N-dimethylformamide to afford mainly the corresponding metallated 2-methoxy-3-nitroporphyrins and 2,2-dimethoxy-3-nitro-2,3-dihydroporphyrins. The zincII chelate 7 is unreactive towards methoxide under identical conditions. When the room temperature reaction of (2-nitro-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrinato)nickel(II) 5 with methoxide is quenched with water after 1 min, the trans-(2-methoxy-3-nitro-2,3-dihydroporphyrinato)nickel(II) 14 is obtained. Inclusion of nitrobenzene in the reaction of the copper(II) chelate 4 with methoxide is beneficial and results in the formation of the 2,2-dimethoxy-3-nitro-2,3-dihydroporphyrin 8 in 90% yield. Reaction of 4 with benzyl oxide ion gives analogous products but in lower yield, while the major product from reaction of 4 with hydroxide ion is the 2-hydroxy-3-nitroporphyrin 16. At elevated temperatures the nature of the reaction of the copper(II) chelate 4 with methoxide changed to afford the corresponding copper(II) 2-alkoxyporphyrin 10 and the denitrated parent porphyrin 20; the later compounds arise from radical reactions. A mechanistic rationale for the processes involved in these temperature-dependent reactions is presented. The ease with which these reactions occur is a consequence of the fact that all the reaction intermediates are able to retain macrocyclic aromaticity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crossley et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: