Key result
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) enabled the reduction of inotropic support and restoration of normal left ventricular ejection fraction by day 2 in a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Does extracorporeal life support (ECLS) improve left ventricular ejection fraction in a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and refractory cardiogenic shock?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does extracorporeal life support (ECLS) improve left ventricular ejection fraction in a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and refractory cardiogenic shock?
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be an effective therapeutic option for managing refractory cardiogenic shock induced by Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
ECLS may be considered in refractory Takotsubo cardiogenic shock; leaves open confirmation of LVEF benefit in prospective studies.
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) is characterized by the sudden onset of reversible left ventricular dysfunction, with a presentation similar to that of an acute coronary syndrome. Although cardiogenic shock is a rare occurrence in TC, if it does occur it may require the use of a left ventricular assist device. We report the use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in a patient with TC and refractory cardiogenic shock. With ECLS it was possible to reduce inotropic support, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction was documented by echocardiography on day 2. This is, to our knowledge, the first reported case of TC with refractory cardiogenic shock treated with ECLS in Portugal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy with refractory cardiogenic shock (n=1). Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) was evaluated on Reduction in inotropic support and recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) enabled the reduction of inotropic support and restoration of normal left ventricular ejection fraction by day 2 in a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: