Key result
The experimental DS(3) scale demonstrated high reliability and corresponded well with the standard DS14 for assessing Type D personality in clinical samples.
Why the study?
Does the experimental DS(3) scale reliably assess Type D personality compared to the standard DS14 in patients with chronic heart failure and peripheral arterial disease?
Cross-Sectional
Does the experimental DS(3) scale reliably assess Type D personality compared to the standard DS14 in patients with chronic heart failure and peripheral arterial disease?
The experimental DS(3) scale is a reliable and potentially more efficient alternative to the standard DS14 for assessing Type D personality in cardiovascular patients.
Type D personality refers to a clustering of 2 stable personality traits, namely negative affectivity and social inhibition. Currently Type D is standardly assessed using the DS14. An experimental Type D personality scale, the DS((3)), was developed to examine an avenue for assessing Type D more efficiently. The DS((3)) differs from the DS14 in its use of a 3-point Likert scale to rate responses, use of all negatively worded items, and a rearranged presentation of items. This article examines the psychometric properties of this questionnaire by examining its dimensionality, item and scale properties, and cutoff scores to screen for Type D personality. Data from 2 clinical samples were analyzed using item response theory. The results suggest that the DS((3)) is a potentially suitable instrument for Type D assessment. It has high reliability, and Type D personality classification based on this scale corresponds well with the current standard Type D assessment based on the DS14.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emons et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic heart failure and peripheral arterial disease. DS(3) scale vs. DS14 scale was evaluated on Psychometric properties including dimensionality, item and scale properties, and cutoff scores. The experimental DS(3) scale demonstrated high reliability and corresponded well with the standard DS14 for assessing Type D personality in clinical samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: