Key result
The David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures demonstrated excellent safety and durability in bicuspid aortic valve patients, with an estimated 30-day mortality of 1.7% and 15-year Kaplan-Meier survival of 87%.
Why the study?
Valve-sparing aortic procedures have shown promise in bicuspid valve-related aortopathy, prompting a synthesis of up-to-date perioperative and long-term outcomes.
Do valve-sparing aortic procedures (David and Yacoub) provide durable freedom from mortality and secondary reoperation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,159)
Do valve-sparing aortic procedures (David and Yacoub) provide durable freedom from mortality and secondary reoperation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve?
Valve-sparing aortic procedures (predominantly the David procedure) demonstrate excellent long-term durability and safety in patients with bicuspid aortic valve, with high freedom from mortality and secondary reoperation up to 15 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports valve-sparing approaches in bicuspid aortopathy; extends evidence with updated perioperative and reoperation outcomes.
Background: Valve-sparing aortic procedures, including the David and Yacoub procedures, have emerged as the dominant approaches in aortic aneurysm surgery, preserving the native aortic valve and thereby conferring significant prognostic benefits to the patient. Over the years, these procedures have also shown promise in patients with bicuspid valve-related aortopathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the most up-to-date data on perioperative outcomes, freedom from secondary reoperation, and freedom from mortality for bicuspid valve patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic operations. Methods: The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 19 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously validated techniques. Results: A total of 1,159 patients were included. Males accounted for 87.4% of the cohort. The mean age of the cohort was 44.9 years. The mean aortic root diameter was estimated to be 46.3 mm, with an estimated range from 38 to 54 mm. Thirty-day mortality rate was estimated to be 1.7%. Eighty-five percent of patients in this series received the David approach, with the remainder receiving the Yacoub approach. Overall, there was low heterogeneity observed for the mean length of intensive care stay, while high heterogeneity was observed for the other remaining variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier freedom from secondary reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 91%, and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the durability and safety of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures across long-term follow-up in bicuspid aortic valve patients. These procedures offer significant freedom from mortality and secondary reoperations on the aorta and valve and will likely continue to demonstrate excellent results into the future. There is a clear transition towards the David procedure, with the bulk of contemporary literature publishing on this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson‐Smith et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy (n=1,159). David and Yacoub procedures was evaluated on Thirty-day mortality (95% CI 0.9-2.3). The David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures demonstrated excellent safety and durability in bicuspid aortic valve patients, with an estimated 30-day mortality of 1.7% and 15-year Kaplan-Meier survival of 87%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: