Key result
Early liberal use of a temporary RVAD (ECMO) in patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD resulted in a similar 6-month survival rate compared to no temporary RVAD (60.4% vs. 71.4%; p=0.585).
Why the study?
Does early liberal implantation of ECMO as a temporary RVAD improve survival at 6 months in patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD?
Cohort (n=44)
Does early liberal implantation of ECMO as a temporary RVAD improve survival at 6 months in patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD?
Absolute Event Rate: 60.4% vs 71.4%
p-value: p=0.585
Early and liberal use of temporary RVAD via ECMO in high-risk patients undergoing LVAD implantation yields comparable 6-month survival to lower-risk patients, suggesting it effectively mitigates the risk of right ventricular failure.
Early liberal ECMO-RVAD yielded comparable survival in higher-risk LVAD patients; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
Refractory right ventricular failure (RVF) after implantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a dramatic complication. The addition of right ventricular assist device (RVAD) may improve RV recovery and lead to improve outcomes. From February 2012 to September 2014, 44 patients received a HeartMate II. These patients were retrospectively compared in two groups according to early liberal implantation of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) used as a RVAD established between a femoral vein and the pulmonary artery. Of the 44 patients, 22 required addition of a temporary RVAD (t-RVAD group). Patients are sicker in the t-RVAD group with significantly higher rate of preoperative extracorporeal life support (46% vs. 9%; p = 0.016) or any mechanical circulatory support (55% vs. 14%; p = 0.01), more preoperative hemofiltration (23% vs. 0%; p = 0.048), and more inotrope support by dobutamine (68.2% vs. 27.3%; p = 0.015). Likewise Michigan risk score was significantly higher in t-RVAD group (2.61 ± 2.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.6 pts; p = 0.013) and INTERMACS clinical profile (2.1 ± 0.6 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3 pts; p = 0.0001). Despite severity of preimplant conditions in t-RVAD group, clinical outcomes did not differ in both groups with similar survival rate at 6 months (60.4 ± 12 vs. 71.4 ± 9.9%; p = 0.585). Early and liberal use of temporary RVAD in patients with risk factors of RVF could improve the prognostic after LVAD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device placement (n=44). Temporary right ventricular assist device (ECMO) vs. No temporary RVAD was evaluated on Survival rate at 6 months (p=0.585). Early liberal use of a temporary RVAD (ECMO) in patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD resulted in a similar 6-month survival rate compared to no temporary RVAD (60.4% vs. 71.4%; p=0.585).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: