Key result
A 20-minute mobile phone call significantly decreased the LF/HF ratio from 1.48 to 1.16 (p<0.05), indicating an increase in parasympathetic tone and a decrease in sympathetic tone.
Why the study?
Does a call with a mobile phone alter heart rate variability in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=32)
No
Does a call with a mobile phone alter heart rate variability in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.16% vs 1.48%
p-value: p=<0.05
A mobile phone call appears to increase parasympathetic tone and decrease sympathetic tone in healthy subjects, though it is unclear if this is due to electromagnetic fields or the act of speaking.
May suggest autonomic shifts with mobile calls in healthy volunteers; leaves open mechanisms, causality, and clinical relevance.
It is possible that electromagnetic field (EMF) generated by mobile phones (MP) may have an influence on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and modulates the function of circulatory system. The aim of the study was to estimate the influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability (HRV) in young healthy people. The time and frequency domain HRV analyses were performed to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance in a group of 32 healthy students with normal electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram at rest. The frequency domain variables were computed: ultra low frequency (ULF) power, very low frequency (VLF) power, low frequency (LF) power, high frequency (HF) power and LF/HF ratio was determined. ECG Holter monitoring was recorded in standardized conditions: from 08:00 to 09:00 in the morning in a sitting position, within 20 min periods: before the telephone call (period I), during the call with use of mobile phone (period II), and after the telephone call (period III). During 20 min call with a mobile phone time domain parameters such as standard deviation of all normal sinus RR intervals (SDNN [ms]--period I: 73.94+/-25.02, period II: 91.63+/-35.99, period III: 75.06+/-27.62; I-II: p<0.05, II-III: p<0.05) and standard deviation of the averaged normal sinus RR intervals for all 5-mm segments (SDANN [ms]--period I: 47.78+/-22.69, period II: 60.72+/-27.55, period III: 47.12+/-23.21; I-II: p<0.05, II-III: p<0.05) were significantly increased. As well as very low frequency (VLF [ms2]--period I: 456.62+/-214.13, period II: 566.84+/-216.99, period III: 477.43+/-203.94; I-II: p<0.05), low frequency (LF [ms(2)]--period I: 607.97+/-201.33, period II: 758.28+/-307.90, period III: 627.09+/-220.33; I-II: p<0.01, II-III: p<0.05) and high frequency (HF [ms(2)]--period I: 538.44+/-290.63, period II: 730.31+/-445.78, period III: 590.94+/-301.64; I-II: p<0.05) components were the highest and the LF/HF ratio (period I: 1.48+/-0.38, period II: 1.16+/-0.35, period III: 1.46+/-0.40; I-II: p<0.05, II-III: p<0.05) was the lowest during a call with a mobile phone. The tone of the parasympathetic system measured indirectly by analysis of heart rate variability was increased while sympathetic tone was lowered during the call with use of a mobile phone. It was shown that the call with a mobile phone may change the autonomic balance in healthy subjects. Changes in heart rate variability during the call with a mobile phone could be affected by electromagnetic field but the influence of speaking cannot be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrzejak et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=32). 20-minute call with a mobile phone vs. Resting state before and after the call was evaluated on LF/HF ratio (sympathovagal balance) (p=<0.05). A 20-minute mobile phone call significantly decreased the LF/HF ratio from 1.48 to 1.16 (p<0.05), indicating an increase in parasympathetic tone and a decrease in sympathetic tone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: