Key result
Competitive athletes with bicuspid aortic valves (n=60 with full 5-year follow-up) showed significant progression of left ventricular and aortic dimensions compared to TAV athletes.
Why the study?
Does competitive sports activity cause deleterious changes in cardiac morphology in athletes with asymptomatic bicuspid aortic valve compared to those with tricuspid aortic valve?
Cohort (n=120)
No
Does competitive sports activity cause deleterious changes in cardiac morphology in athletes with asymptomatic bicuspid aortic valve compared to those with tricuspid aortic valve?
Competitive sports activity does not have a deleterious impact on cardiac morphology in athletes with asymptomatic bicuspid aortic valve, as progression of aortic and LV dimensions is similar to non-athletic BAV populations.
May reassure on sports participation in asymptomatic BAV athletes; leaves open whether progression exceeds sedentary BAV controls.
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital cardiac disease in the general population and in athletes. Data on the morphological and functional cardiac parameters are available in non-athletic BAV population. Though BAV is compatible with sports activity, the impact that regular training may have on the heart has not yet been investigated. Purpose: We followed up with echocardiography a group of competitive athletes with BAV matched with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) group. METHODS: A group of 120 consecutive athletes diagnosed with BAV were followed from January 1999 to December 2005 with yearly echocardiographic evaluations. 60 of these athletes had a full 5 years of follow up. The protocol study was performed at the University Teaching Hospital Specialist Clinic of Florence(Italy). RESULTS: After five years, BAV athletes showed significant progression of left ventricular dimensions and aortic diameters (tab1) despite the values maintain within the range of the general non-athletic BAV populations described in previous studies. In TAV athletes, the aortic and left ventricle dimensions did not increase significantly, and remained within physiological range.TableCONCLUSIONS: There is a significant progressive increase in aorta and left ventricular measurements in competitive BAV athletes as compared to TAV athletes. The rate of the progression in BAV athletes is similar to that in the non-athletic BAV population. Sports activity does not have a deleterious impact on cardiac morphology in athletes with asymptomatic BAV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefani et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) (n=120). Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. Tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) was evaluated on Progression of left ventricular dimensions and aortic diameters. Competitive athletes with bicuspid aortic valves (n=60 with full 5-year follow-up) showed significant progression of left ventricular and aortic dimensions compared to TAV athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: