Key result
Individual differences in perceived stress reactivity showed no significant associations with tonic or phasic levels of heart-rate variability during a socially evaluated cold pressor test, but were associated with self-reported stress and pain.
Why the study?
Valid alternatives to costly, time-consuming lab-based physiological methods for assessing individual differences in stress reactivity in student athletes are lacking.
Does perceived stress reactivity correlate with heart-rate variability and stress appraisals during a socially evaluated cold pressor test in university students?
Cross-Sectional (n=61)
Does perceived stress reactivity correlate with heart-rate variability and stress appraisals during a socially evaluated cold pressor test in university students?
Perceived stress reactivity in student athletes correlates with subjective cognitive stress appraisals but not with physiological heart-rate variability responses during a cold pressor test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perceived stress reactivity links to subjective but not HRV responses in student athletes; leaves open self-report scale validity as low-cost alternative.
Britton et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Stress Reactivity (n=61). Perceived stress reactivity (PSRS-AA) was evaluated on Association between perceived stress reactivity (RSE subscale) and high-frequency heart-rate variability (HF-HRV) during a socially evaluated cold pressor test. Individual differences in perceived stress reactivity showed no significant associations with tonic or phasic levels of heart-rate variability during a socially evaluated cold pressor test, but were associated with self-reported stress and pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: