Key result
Axillary artery cannulation reduced overall mortality, neurological, and malperfusion complications compared with femoral artery cannulation in most reviewed studies.
Why the study?
Does axillary artery cannulation reduce mortality and neurological complications compared to femoral artery cannulation in patients undergoing surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection?
Systematic Review
Does axillary artery cannulation reduce mortality and neurological complications compared to femoral artery cannulation in patients undergoing surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection?
Axillary artery cannulation appears superior to femoral artery cannulation for reducing mortality and neurological complications during acute type A aortic dissection surgery, though femoral access remains a bailout option for rapid bypass.
AXC may reduce mortality and neuro complications versus FAC in type A dissection repair; supports selective use but leaves open need for RCTs.
A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether axillary artery cannulation (AXC) is superior to femoral artery cannulation (FAC) in patients undergoing surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. A total of 90 studies were identified using the reported search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. There were nine retrospective studies and one meta-analysis. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. Four papers, including the meta-analysis, reported significantly increased mortality in patients undergoing surgery with FAC. From these, two papers, again including the meta-analysis, reported also significantly increased neurological dysfunction, and another one demonstrated significantly increased incidence of postoperative bleeding and sternal infections in this same group of patients. Two more studies reported decreased mortality, malperfusion and neurological complications in patients undergoing surgical repair with AXC, but no statistical analysis was performed. Three reports comparing AXC and FAC found no difference between the two groups in terms of operative mortality and major complications, while another one demonstrated increased incidence of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery with AXC, most likely due to the presence of malperfusion of one or more organs preoperatively in those who died. Patients undergoing repair of type A aortic dissection may benefit from AXC, whenever this is technically feasible. Most reports show that inflow perfusion through the axillary artery will reduce overall mortality, and neurological and malperfusion complications when compared with FAC. However, it needs to be stressed that, in three reports, the superiority of AXC over FAC might be attributed to the fact that patients in the latter group were critically ill in haemodynamic collapse. Nevertheless, this indicates that the femoral artery remains a bailout option in the emergency situation when institution of cardiopulmonary bypass is required rapidly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patris et al. (2015) conducted a systematic review in Acute type A aortic dissection. Axillary artery cannulation (AXC) vs. Femoral artery cannulation (FAC) was evaluated on Mortality. Axillary artery cannulation reduced overall mortality, neurological, and malperfusion complications compared with femoral artery cannulation in most reviewed studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: