Key result
Community-based culturally-tailored education programs for Black adults with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke are the focus of this systematic review protocol, which aims to determine key program characteristics and outcomes.
Why the study?
Chronic conditions and stroke disproportionately affect Black adults due to systemic racism and disparities, but community-based culturally-tailored programs are relatively understudied.
Do community-based culturally-tailored programs improve health outcomes in Black adults with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or stroke?
Systematic Review
Do community-based culturally-tailored programs improve health outcomes in Black adults with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or stroke?
This protocol outlines a systematic review to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of community-based culturally-tailored programs for Black adults with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
Culturally tailored community programs may improve postacute access for Black adults with stroke and chronic conditions; extends equity-focused cardiovascular research.
Background Chronic conditions and stroke disproportionately affect Black adults in communities all around the world due patterns of systemic racism, disparities in care, and lack of resources. To address unequal care received by Black communities, a shift to community-based programs that deliver culturally-tailored programs to meet the needs of the communities they serve, including Black adults who tend to have reduced access to postacute services, may give an alternative to a healthcare model which reinforces health inequities. However, community-based culturally-tailored programs (CBCT) are relatively understudied but show promise to improve the delivery of services to marginalized communities. The objectives of this review are to: (i) determine key program characteristics and outcomes of CBCT programs that are designed to improve health outcomes in Black adults with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or stroke and (ii) identify which of the five categories of culturally appropriate programs from Kreuter and colleagues have been used to implement CBCT programs. Methods This is a protocol for a systematic review that will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases to identify community-based culturally-tailored programs for Black adults with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or stroke. Discussion Health inequities have disproportionately impacted Black communities and will continue to persist if adjustments are not prioritized within healthcare to provide services, care, and programs meant to address the specific barriers to better health experienced. Many interventions meant to improve the health outcomes of marginalized groups are created with little input from target communities, leading to interventions that may not address the specific barriers contributing to poor health outcomes and are designed and implemented from an outsider’s perspective. The inclusion of community members allows for a deeper understanding of the issues facing the community and provides an opportunity to incorporate cultural values to potentially increase the efficacy, tailoring the intervention to distinct communities. An alternative to current healthcare interventions must be explored to reduce the health gap experienced by Black adults. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42021245772
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fulton et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke. Community-based culturally-tailored education programs was evaluated on Key program characteristics and outcomes of CBCT programs. Community-based culturally-tailored education programs for Black adults with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke are the focus of this systematic review protocol, which aims to determine key program characteristics and outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: