Experimental study reveals higher volatility of AMP relative to piperazine in aqueous wash solutions, indicating weak amine interactions and refining post-combustion emission control models.
• Novel experimental VLE data for AMP/PZ/H 2 O systems obtained under relevant water wash conditions for carbon capture. • AMP presents significant higher volatility than PZ. • High AMP/PZ ratios have no impact on amine volatility suggesting weak interaction between amines. • eNRTL thermodynamic models underpredicts PZ volatile emissions. New vapour liquid equilibrium (VLE) ebulliometric data for 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) and Piperazine (PZ) aqueous solutions are presented in this work for a range of temperatures, 30 ◦ C, 40 ◦ C and 50 ◦ C, and AMP:PZ molar ratios of 3:1.5/4:1/6:1 representative of those expected in water wash systems typically located at the top of absorber columns as an effective emission mitigation strategy in post-combustion carbon capture. The scatter in experimental data for AMP and PZ partial pressures suggests that obtaining VLE experimental data at low temperatures and low amine concentrations is challenging, despite its necessity. Experimental VLE data also suggest that an increase in the AMP/PZ ratio, as typically encountered in water wash processes, does not notably impact the volatility of each amine. The newly developed NRTL thermodynamic models in Aspen Plus ( Yi et al. 2024 ) and Matlab (Hartono et al. 2021a) for the quaternary system AMP/Pz/H 2 O/CO 2 show improvements in predicting the volatility of amines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charalambous et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: