Key result
Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional treatment significantly improved clinical efficacy compared to conventional treatment alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction (RR 1.09).
Why the study?
Mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients remains substantial despite decreasing incidence, prompting evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine like Xuesaitong injection for its treatment.
Does Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional treatment improve clinical efficacy and left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Meta-Analysis (n=539)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional treatment improve clinical efficacy and left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Relative Risk: 1.09 (95% CI 1.01–1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 92.22% vs 82.9%
p-value: p=0.04
Xuesaitong injection added to conventional therapy for acute myocardial infarction may improve clinical symptoms and left ventricular function, though evidence is limited by the low quality of included trials.
BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is decreasing, the mortality in AMI patients remains substantial. Traditional Chinese medicine has shown its role in the prevention and management of AMI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Xuesaitong injection (XST) for the treatment of AMI by a meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in 5 medical databases up to June 1, 2020. Randomized controlled trials involving XST combined with conventional treatment versus conventional treatment were included. A meta-analysis of clinical efficacy, left ventricular function and other objective parameters was performed to evaluate the effects of XST on AMI. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving 539 participants were eventually included. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of XST and conventional treatment could achieve significantly better effect on improving clinical efficacy (risk ratio: 1.09 [1.01, 1.17]; P = .04), left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD]: 3.18 [1.69, 4.67]; P < .0001), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (MD: -2.58 [-5.04, -0.12]; P = .04), interleukin 6 (MD: -26.00 [-38.85, -13.16]; P < .0001), cardiac troponin T (MD: -15.85 [-18.09, -13.61]; P < .00001) and creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (MD: -73.06 [-79.74, -66.37]; P < .00001). CONCLUSION: XST combined with conventional treatment can achieve better efficacy on clinical performance and some of the AMI related parameters. However the interpretation of the results should be cautious, due to the relatively low quality of included trials. More rigorously designed, large-scaled, randomized controlled trials are warranted to support its clinical use in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hua et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute myocardial infarction (n=539). Xuesaitong injection vs. Conventional treatment (PCI, antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy) was evaluated on Clinical efficacy (amelioration of AMI related clinical syndromes >75%) (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p=0.04). Xuesaitong injection combined with conventional treatment significantly improved clinical efficacy compared to conventional treatment alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction (RR 1.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: