BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To find out the prevalence of relevant atherosclerotic plaques in the aortic arch and their potential role as a source of embolism in cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: We performed a transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on 49 patients with cryptogenic stroke from a total series of 212 non-selected patients with acute ischaemic stroke studied prospectively by cranial computed tomography (CT), colour-duplex and transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography with micro-embolic signal (MES) monitoring. Cryptogenic stroke was diagnosed in those patients without carotid or intracranial stenosis > 50%, nor lacunar or cardio-embolic strokes. We defined relevant plaques as those > or = 4 mm thick located in the ascending aorta or proximal arch. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (46.9%) had atherosclerotic aortic plaques (AAP): 3 in the ascending aorta (in 1 > or = 4 mm), 11 in the proximal aortic arch (in 4 > or = 4 mm) and 9 in the descending aorta (in 5 > or = 4 mm). Hence, 5 patients (10.2%) had relevant plaques. Aortic plaques were significantly related to older age (p < 0.001) and male gender (p = 0.042). A carotid artery stenosis < 50% was found in 39% of patients with AAP and in 8% of those without AAP (p = 0.009). MES were detected in 3 patients with plaques > or = 4 mm thick, but not in those without AAP or with AAP < 4 mm thick (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Although few patients with cryptogenic stroke had relevant plaques in our non-selected population, our results support the hypothesis that relevant aortic plaques have embolic potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castellanos et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: