This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective To develop and validate a multivariate prediction model for hypotension following neuraxial anesthesia in preeclamptic parturients. Methods This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 1,402 preeclamptic parturients (gestational age ≥28 weeks) from three tertiary centers (2013–2024). After exclusions (n = 569), 833 patients were allocated to training (n = 495), internal validation (n = 213), and external validation (n = 125) cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, with subsequent nomogram construction. Model performance was assessed via discrimination (AUC), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow), and clinical utility [decision curve analysis (DCA), clinical impact curves (CIC)]. Results Seven independent predictors were identified: platelet count (OR 0.920, 95%CI 0.876–0.966), sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (OR 1.039, 95%CI 1.002–1.078), baseline perfusion index (OR 0.221, 95%CI 0.101–0.485), T6 anesthesia level (OR 11.353, 95%CI 1.408–29.320), local anesthetic dose (OR 29.391, 95%CI 4.792–38.270), fetal weight (OR 1.004, p = 0.045), and umbilical artery S/D ratio (OR 9.319, p < 0.001). The nomogram demonstrated robust discrimination (training AUC 0.851; internal validation AUC 0.836; external validation AUC 0.810) and calibration (mean absolute errors: 0.013–0.038). DCA confirmed clinical utility at a 45% risk threshold (net benefit 0.62), capturing 85% of events with 32% false positives. Conclusion This validated prediction model accurately stratifies hypotension risk in preeclamptic parturients receiving neuraxial anesthesia. The nomogram facilitates targeted prophylactic interventions, optimizing resource allocation and maternal hemodynamic stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: