Prospective cohort study shows sacroiliac joint belts improve pain and mobility in pregnant individuals with pelvic girdle pain, indicating effective nonpharmacological relief.
Introduction Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is the most common musculoskeletal concern in pregnancy. The Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test is diagnostic. Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) belts are included in multimodal therapy, but there is no established predictive measure to determine which pregnant women will benefit. Objective To determine if the ASLR score is immediately reduced by SIJ belt application and whether PGP pain and function improves after 4 weeks of belt use. Design Prospective observational cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Participants Pregnant women at least 18 years of age in the second or third trimester of pregnancy with posterior PGP and ASLR score of 2 to 10. Interventions Four‐week SIJ belt use. Main Outcome Measures ASLR, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Perceived Global Impression of Improvement (PGII). Results Sixty‐three women enrolled. On multivariable analysis, immediate belted ASLR score was −2.70 points lower than the non‐belted ASLR score (P < .001). Four weeks later there was significant improvement in the ASLR score with a belt (Mdiff = −0.99; P = .001) and without a belt (Mdiff = −1.94; P < .001); the decline was more precipitous for the non‐belted response (Mdiff = −0.96; P = .02). Current NRS pain scores declined from baseline by approximately −0.94 points (P < .001). This decline did not depend on ASLR scores (interaction P = .43) or wearing a belt at the time of testing (interaction P = .51). Similar conclusions held for participants' usual NRS score and average PGQ score. After 4 weeks, 82% reported improvement based on the PGII. Conclusions SIJ belts are a safe, well‐tolerated, and effective therapeutic option for pregnancy‐related PGP. The ASLR score is immediately reduced following SIJ belt application but does not predict pain score 4 weeks later. SIJ belt leads to significant improvements in pain and function over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitzgerald et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: