: Common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the leading grain legume consumed directly by humans and a primary source of nutrients in many communities. This study utilized common bean genotypes with diverse seed coat phenotypes to investigate genotypic and environmental effects on pigmented seed coat area and seed macronutrient (protein, starch, fat, ash, moisture), anti-nutrient (phytate), and mineral nutrient (iron, zinc, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium) profiles. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) that comprise six phenotypic classes for seed coat patterning and nine commercial cultivars were field-evaluated for multiple years across inland, coastal, and intermountain environments in California. A custom near-infrared spectroscopy calibration had improved performance for macronutrients relative to a pre-existing calibration. Environmental effects on macronutrients in this data set were pronounced; the 2022 coastal growing environment was the most distinct, characterized by significantly higher starch and moisture content and significantly lower protein content in the RILs relative to any other environments. Across growing years in the RILs, greater consistency was observed at the inland site, where only protein was significantly different; all macronutrient traits significantly differed within the intermountain site. Certain commercial cultivars largely maintained their relative rank for protein content across environments, indicating consistency of genotypic performance, and Black Nightfall ranked among the highest for iron, zinc, phosphorus, and magnesium. Percent pigmented seed coat area was significantly negatively correlated with both calcium and magnesium concentrations. These results underscore the importance of continued multi-environment field trials to understand, and leverage in crop improvement, the genetic and environmental basis of seed coat patterning, seed nutritional composition, and their interplay within and among market classes of common bean.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: