Key result
Wearable-based nocturnal normalized pulse arrival time (n-PAT) demonstrated a stronger correlation with arterial stiffness (ln(E0)) compared to nocturnal blood pressure (0.91 vs. 0.56).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether pulse arrival time conveys complementary information to blood pressure for vascular health assessment.
Does wearable-based pulse arrival time provide complementary information to ambulatory blood pressure for assessing vascular health?
Observational (n=27)
Does wearable-based pulse arrival time provide complementary information to ambulatory blood pressure for assessing vascular health?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.91% vs 0.56%
Wearable-based pulse arrival time provides complementary information to ambulatory blood pressure regarding arterial stiffness, which may aid in vascular health assessment and antihypertensive treatment design.
Pulse arrival time (PAT) has been broadly investigated for its potential for cuffless blood pressure (BP) estimation and ease of measurement by wearable devices. It is also of great significance to explore whether PAT conveys complementary information to BP for vascular health assessment. In this paper, the differences between the 24-h ambulatory BP and wearable-based PAT were compared among 12 young normotensives and 15 elderly hypertensives in terms of the mean and coefficients of variation (CoVs). The correlations of the nocturnal normalized PAT (n-PAT) and BP with two arterial stiffness-related parameters (i.e., the intrinsic elastic modulus E0 and the vascular modulation factor α) estimated by a proposed model-based method were also compared. The results showed that the inter-subject variances of the nocturnal average n-PAT were significantly different between the hypertensives and the normotensives (P < 0.001), and the intra-subject CoVs of the nocturnal n-PAT were also significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). However, these findings were not shown in the nocturnal BP. The correlation coefficient between the nocturnal average n-PAT and ln(E0) is larger than that with the nocturnal BP, i.e., 0.91 vs. 0.56. Furthermore, the result also revealed that all the hypertensives receiving antihypertensive medications did not achieve the optimal control of the nocturnal BP while presented diverse arterial stiffness indicated by the nocturnal average n-PAT and ln(E0). It is concluded that wearable-based PAT contains complementary information about the vascular system to the ambulatory BP, which may be useful for designing effective antihypertensive treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=27). Wearable-based nocturnal normalized pulse arrival time (n-PAT) vs. Ambulatory nocturnal blood pressure (BP) was evaluated on Correlation coefficient with intrinsic elastic modulus (ln(E0)). Wearable-based nocturnal normalized pulse arrival time (n-PAT) demonstrated a stronger correlation with arterial stiffness (ln(E0)) compared to nocturnal blood pressure (0.91 vs. 0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: