Why the study?
Does pregnancy alter the time required for pre-oxygenation compared to the non-pregnant state in a physiological model?
Does pregnancy alter the time required for pre-oxygenation compared to the non-pregnant state in a physiological model?
Computer simulation suggests that 2 minutes of tidal breathing is sufficient for pre-oxygenation in pregnant patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports shorter pre-oxygenation in pregnancy models; leaves open human translation and practice change.
Hypoxaemia during anaesthetic induction in obstetrics is hazardous for mother and baby, but the onset of desaturation can be delayed by pre-oxygenation. This study investigated pre-oxygenation during pregnancy using computer simulation. The Nottingham Physiology Simulator was configured to replicate normal pregnant physiology. Three pregnant and three non-pregnant subjects were created, representing population variation according to published physiological values. They underwent pre-oxygenation by tidal and vital capacity breathing of 100% oxygen. Pre-oxygenation during tidal breathing proceeded more rapidly in pregnancy, the median [range] time to achieve 95% of the maximum change in P(E)O2 being 1 min 37 s [1:23-1:52] in pregnant subjects, compared to 2 min 51 s [2:28-3:15] in non-pregnant subjects. Vital capacity pre-oxygenation required seven breaths [5-10] in pregnant subjects, compared to six breaths [4-9] in non-pregnant subjects, to achieve the same P(E)O2 as after 95% complete tidal pre-oxygenation. We recommend 2 min of tidal breathing for pre-oxygenation in pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McClelland et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: