Key result
Exenatide exposure was associated with significantly higher flow mediated dilation compared with glimepiride (9.1 vs. 5.6, p = 0.01) after 16 weeks in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does exenatide improve endothelial function assessed by flow mediated dilation compared to glimepiride in subjects with type 2 diabetes?
Observational
Does exenatide improve endothelial function assessed by flow mediated dilation compared to glimepiride in subjects with type 2 diabetes?
Chronic administration of exenatide improves arterial dilation compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting potential vascular benefits.
May suggest endothelial benefits of exenatide in T2D; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
The GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide has been approved for adjunctive treatment of type 2 diabetes. Continuous GLP-1 infusion improves endothelial function in vivo; no evidence about a beneficial effect of exenatide on vascular function has been published. The aim of our observational study was to evaluate whether exenatide would improve brachial artery function evaluated by the flow mediated dilation (FMD) technique, compared with glimepiride, in subjects with type 2 diabetes. FMD time course was assessed by ultrasound, after 5 min forearm ischaemia, at baseline and after 16-week treatment. At the end of the study FMD was significantly higher in subjects who assumed exenatide compared with glimepiride (9.1 ± 3.6 vs. 5.6 ± 1.0, p = 0.01). Even if limited by the small number of studied subjects, who were not matched in the two treatment groups, this research study represents the first FMD evidence suggesting that chronic administration of exenatide improves arterial dilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irace et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes. Exenatide vs. Glimepiride was evaluated on Brachial artery function evaluated by the flow mediated dilation (FMD) technique (p=0.01). Exenatide exposure was associated with significantly higher flow mediated dilation compared with glimepiride (9.1 vs. 5.6, p = 0.01) after 16 weeks in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: