Key result
Tethering of splicing factor SF1 or CPSF3 stimulated mRNA processing in the correct positions, whereas PTB homologues inhibited processing and SR-domain proteins promoted the use of alternative upstream signals in Trypanosoma brucei.
Why the study?
Factors that influence trans splicing acceptor site choice have been little investigated, despite spliced leader trans splicing being widespread in eukaryotic evolution.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The functions of PTB and SR-domain proteins in splice site definition were likely present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor.
Spliced leader trans splicing is the addition of a short, capped sequence to the 5’ end of mRNAs. It is widespread in eukaryotic evolution, but factors that influence trans splicing acceptor site choice have been little investigated. In Kinetoplastids, all protein-coding mRNAs are 5’ trans spliced. A polypyrimidine tract is usually found upstream of the AG splice acceptor, but there is no branch point consensus; moreover, splicing dictates polyadenylation of the preceding mRNA. We here describe a trans splicing reporter system that can be used for studies and screens concerning the roles of sequences and proteins in processing site choice and efficiency. Splicing was poor with poly(U) tracts less than 9 nt long, and was influenced by nearby secondary structures. A screen for signals resulted in selection of sequences that were on average 45% U and 35% C. Tethering of either the splicing factor SF1, or the cleavage and polyadenylation factor CPSF3 within the intron stimulated processing in the correct positions, while tethering of two possible homologues of Opisthokont PTB inhibited processing. In contrast, tethering of SR-domain proteins RBSR1, RBSR2, or TSR1 or its interaction partner TSR1IP, promoted use of alternative signals upstream of the tethering sites. RBSR1 interacts predominantly with proteins implicated in splicing, whereas the interactome of RBSR2 is more diverse. These results suggest that the functions of PTB and SR-domain proteins in splice site definition were already present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waithaka et al. (2022) studied Trypanosoma brucei mRNA processing. Tethering of splicing factors (SF1, CPSF3, PTB homologues, SR-domain proteins) vs. Control (lambdaN-GFP-2myc or wild-type) was evaluated on mRNA processing site choice and efficiency. Tethering of splicing factor SF1 or CPSF3 stimulated mRNA processing in the correct positions, whereas PTB homologues inhibited processing and SR-domain proteins promoted the use of alternative upstream signals in Trypanosoma brucei.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: