Key result
A framework combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data predicted response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy with 91.2% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 62.5% specificity.
Why the study?
Does a framework combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data accurately predict response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) in patients selected for CRT?
Cohort (n=34)
Does a framework combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data accurately predict response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) in patients selected for CRT?
A novel machine learning framework combining a cardiac motion atlas and non-motion data accurately predicts CRT response with 91.2% accuracy.
Supports motion atlas integration for CRT prediction in selected cohorts; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We present a framework for combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data. The atlas represents cardiac cycle motion across a number of subjects in a common space based on rich motion descriptors capturing 3D displacement, velocity, strain and strain rate. The non-motion data are derived from a variety of sources such as imaging, electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical reports. Once in the atlas space, we apply a novel supervised learning approach based on random projections and ensemble learning to learn the relationship between the atlas data and some desired clinical output. We apply our framework to the problem of predicting response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT). Using a cohort of 34 patients selected for CRT using conventional criteria, results show that the combination of motion and non-motion data enables CRT response to be predicted with 91.2% accuracy (100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity), which compares favourably with the current state-of-the-art in CRT response prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peressutti et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) response (n=34). Combination of cardiac motion atlas and non-motion data was evaluated on CRT response prediction accuracy. A framework combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data predicted response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy with 91.2% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 62.5% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: