Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In situ immunofluorescence assay (ISIFA) was developed for the selection for treatment of chronically infected chagasic patients and their follow-up. Trypomastigotes flash fixed in situ on microscopic slides with 0.025% glutaraldehyde were used as antigen. ISIFA results were compared with complement-mediated lysis (CoML), membrane immunofluorescence (MbIFA), immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with epimastigotes, and xenodiagnosis (XENO). ISIFA was able to distinguish nontreated chagasic patients (geometric mean titer [GMT] = 180) and treatment failures (GMT = 160) from those considered successfully treated (GMT = 25). ISIFA revealed a high sensitivity and titers of 80 or higher detected 98.6% of patients with active infections, even in those with negative XENO, CoML, or MbIFA. Specificity evaluated in 63 sera from other infections, including leishmaniasis and autoimmune diseases, was 98%. IFA used in routine diagnostic procedures exhibited similar results in all groups, irrespective of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levy et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: