Key result
Open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion was associated with a significantly lower incidence of perioperative stroke (0.9% vs 10%, p=0.001) compared to non-open anastomosis.
Why the study?
Outcomes after Freestyle bioprosthesis root replacement with or without additional procedures on the ascending aorta and proximal arch using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion were not well established.
Does open arch anastomosis with unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion reduce stroke and improve outcomes compared to non-open anastomosis in patients undergoing aortic root replacement?
Cohort (n=271)
No
Does open arch anastomosis with unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion reduce stroke and improve outcomes compared to non-open anastomosis in patients undergoing aortic root replacement?
Open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion during aortic root replacement is associated with a significantly lower incidence of perioperative stroke compared to non-open techniques, without increasing mortality.
May support open arch anastomosis with unilateral ACP to lower stroke risk in aortic root replacement; leaves open randomized confirmation.
Background: The Freestyle® bioprosthesis is used for pathologies of the aortic root. Additional resection of the ascending aorta and the proximal arch in dissections or aneurysms might be indicated. The aim was to assess mid-term outcome regarding prosthetic performance, stroke, reoperations, and survival in various pathologies comparing patients with and without additional procedures on the ascending aorta and proximal arch focusing on the standardized technique of unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of 278 consecutive patients after Freestyle® root replacement between September 2007 and March 2017. Patients were divided in three categories due to the pathology of the aortic root (re-operation vs endocarditis vs dissection). Two groups based on the aortic anastomosis technique (non-open arch anastomosis (non-OA) versus open arch anastomosis (OA)) were compared (119 OA vs 159 non-OA). Cardiovascular risk, previous cardiac events, intra- and postoperative data were evaluated. Inferential statistics were performed with Mann-Whitney U-test. Nominal and categorical variables were tested with Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess survival.Results: The follow-up rate was 90% (median follow-up: 39.5 months). There were differences in the indication (endocarditis: OA 5 (4.2%) vs non-OA 36 (24%), p<0.0001; dissection: OA 13 (10.9%) vs non-OA 2 (1.3%); p=0.0007). OA patients had less perioperative stroke (1 (1%) vs 15 (10%), p=0.001) and shorter hospital stay (9 vs 12 days, p=0.0004). There were no differences in the mortality (in-hospital: non-OA 8 (5%) vs OA 8 (7%); p=0.6; death at follow-up: non-OA 15 (11%) vs OA 5 (5%); p=0.1). Overall valve performance showed a well-functioning valve in 97.3% at follow-up.Conclusion: The valve performance showed excellent results regardless of the initial indication. The incidence of stroke was lower in patients receiving an open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion without elevated mortality or prolonged hospital stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zientara et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Pathologies of the aortic root (n=271). Open arch anastomosis vs. Non-open arch anastomosis was evaluated on Perioperative stroke (p=0.001). Open arch anastomosis using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion was associated with a significantly lower incidence of perioperative stroke (0.9% vs 10%, p=0.001) compared to non-open anastomosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: