Why the study?
Does female sex increase the risk of acute complications and restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?
Does female sex increase the risk of acute complications and restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?
Women undergoing PTCA for stable angina pectoris have a significantly higher risk of acute complications such as abrupt vessel closure and myocardial infarction compared to men, although long-term restenosis rates are similar.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Female sex was associated with higher acute PTCA complications; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies apply in contemporary PCI.
BACKGROUND: Several investigators report a sex bias in the treatment of coronary artery disease. This study attempts to define sex differences in the outcome of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and to determine risk factors contributing to these results. RESULTS: Data were collected from 1082 patients (887 men and 195 women). In women, the risk of abrupt vessel closure (8.1% versus 2.5%, odds ratio 3.46) and of myocardial infarction (6.2% versus 1.2%, odds ratio 5.58) following PTCA for stable angina pectoris was significantly increased. History of myocardial infarction and PTCA of a vessel of less than 3.0 mm diameter predicted abrupt vessel closure in women. Age and cardiovascular risk factors were not predictors. The incidence of restenosis did not differ significantly (angiographic restenosis in women 36.1% versus 40.8% in men, P=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly increased risk of acute complications could only be documented in women undergoing PTCA for stable angina pectoris and not in acute coronary syndrome. Long-term outcome was similar between the two sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidland et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: