Key result
Female sex predicts a ~52% lower risk of cardiovascular emergencies in ED chest pain patients.
Why the study?
Sex-related differences in chest pain management are increasingly recognised, and multimodal sex-neutral assessment and sex-specific troponin thresholds have been proposed to reduce disparities.
Are there sex differences in triage priority and outcomes among ED patients with chest pain evaluated using a sex-neutral triage protocol and sex-specific troponin thresholds?
Cohort (n=6,017)
No
Are there sex differences in triage priority and outcomes among ED patients with chest pain evaluated using a sex-neutral triage protocol and sex-specific troponin thresholds?
Odds Ratio: 0.48 (95% CI 0.39–0.59)
Despite using sex-neutral triage protocols and sex-specific troponin thresholds, significant sex disparities persist in the emergency evaluation of chest pain, with women experiencing longer delays and lower triage priority.
Triage disparities may prolong delays for women with chest pain; leaves open whether sex-specific protocols improve equity.
BACKGROUND: Chest pain (CP) is a common reason for Emergency Department (ED) presentation and may signal life-threatening cardiovascular emergencies (CVE). Sex-related differences in CP management are increasingly recognised, and multimodal sex-neutral assessment and sex-specific troponin thresholds have been proposed to reduce disparities. METHODS: Consecutive adults with haemodynamically stable CP presenting to a tertiary ED (2021-2023) were prospectively enrolled. A sex-neutral triage protocol incorporating symptom severity, physiological parameters, ECG findings, and cardiovascular risk factors was applied, alongside sex-specific troponin thresholds. Clinical characteristics, ED management and 30-day outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Among 6017 patients, 2703 (44.9%) were women. Median age was 60 years in females vs 59 in males (p < 0.001). Women showed greater clinical heterogeneity, more frequently reporting posterior CP, epigastric pain, dyspnoea, and nausea/vomiting. High-priority triage codes were less often assigned to women (29.2% vs 37.9%, p < 0.001). Female sex independently predicted lower CVE risk (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.59). CVE predictors differed by sex, with dyspnoea, peripheral artery disease, and Q waves associated with CVE in women. Women were hospitalised less frequently but experienced a longer ED stay before admission (19.0 vs 11.9 h, p < 0.001). Females with CVE were more frequently assigned lower-priority triage codes and experienced longer delays to troponin testing and to hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant sex differences persist in CP evaluation, even with sex-neutral, risk-informed triage protocols incorporating ECG findings and cardiovascular risk factors, alongside sex-specific troponin thresholds. Further strategies addressing sex-specific patterns across the entire CP pathway are needed to improve equity in emergency care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanelli et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chest pain (n=6,017). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Cardiovascular emergencies (CVE) (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.59). Female sex independently predicted a lower risk of cardiovascular emergencies (adjusted OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.39-0.59) among adults presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: