Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The crystal structures are reported for two compounds containing novel perforated layer structures, [DBA] 2Cd 9Cl 20.2H 2O and [Cu(TIM)] 2Cu 13Cl 30(H 2O) 2. xH 2O, where [DBA] (+) = di n-butylammonium and TIM = 2,3,9,10-tetramethyl-1,3,8,10-tetraenecyclo- 1,4,8,11-tetraazatetradecane. In the former compound, single Cd (2+) ions are excised from the parent CdCl 2 layers, with water molecules hydrogen bonded to chloride ions on both sides of the excision. Lattice stability is provided by the DBA (+) cations, which have an all-trans conformation. These lie between the layers, hydrogen bonding to the adjacent [Cd 9Cl 20(H 2O) 2] n (2 n- ) sheets. In the copper compound, the modification of the parent CuCl 2 structure is much more complex. In this compound, [Cu 2Cl 2] (2+) moieties are excised in a regular fashion. In addition, at 50% of the Cu1 sites, CuCl 2 species are replaced by pairs of water molecules in a random fashion. The Cu(TIM) (2+) cations bridge the layers via the formation of two semicoordinate bonds to chloride ions at the edge of the [Cu 2Cl 2] (2+) excision sites of adjacent layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorn et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: