Key result
Manual workers seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi had a higher risk of an abnormal exercise ECG test compared to seronegative workers (26.2% vs 16.1%; OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8).
Why the study?
Does Trypanosoma cruzi seropositivity increase the risk of abnormal exercise electrocardiogram responses in apparently healthy manual workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=278)
Does Trypanosoma cruzi seropositivity increase the risk of abnormal exercise electrocardiogram responses in apparently healthy manual workers?
Apparently healthy manual workers with Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies have a higher risk of complex ventricular premature beats during exercise testing, suggesting a role for routine exercise screening in this population before engaging in high-risk activities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports targeted exercise testing in seropositive workers; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Blood pressure, heart rate and electrocardiographic responses to exercise were compared in a group of 125 subjects with antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi and in 153 seronegative subjects, randomly selected from persons with no evidence of heart disease in a resting electrocardiogram during a cross-sectional survey among apparently healthy manual workers. The mean heart rates and diastolic and systolic blood pressures of those in each group did not differ statistically at different phases of the exercise test and there was no evidence of a difference in physical fitness between those in the 2 groups. An abnormal test was recorded in 26.2% of seropositive, and in 16.1% of seronegative, subjects (odds ratio adjusted for age, sex and body mass index [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.1-3.8). No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the occurrence of hypertensive response to exercise (6.4% among seropositives and 5.9% among seronegatives), ST depression greater than 1 mm (0.8% and 2.0%), supraventricular premature beats (4.8% and 2.6%) or conduction defects (0.8% and 1.3%). Complex ventricular premature beats were recorded more often in seropositive subjects (12.8% and 3.9%; OR = 3.7, 95% CI = 1.4-9.8, P less than 0.01). The risk of an abnormal test increased with age in both groups. A history of cardiovascular symptoms, gender and body mass was not associated with the risk of an abnormal response in the test. The findings suggest that exercise testing might be a routine procedure when subjects with antibodies to T. cruzi are being assessed for participation in potentially high risk activities, such as heavy manual work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zicker et al. (1990) conducted a cross-sectional in Trypanosoma cruzi infection (Chagas disease) (n=278). Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi vs. Seronegative subjects was evaluated on Abnormal exercise electrocardiogram test (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8). Manual workers seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi had a higher risk of an abnormal exercise ECG test compared to seronegative workers (26.2% vs 16.1%; OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: