Key result
This is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of motivational nondirective resonance breathing and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in patients with fibromyalgia; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Fibromyalgia has few safe and effective treatments, but vagal nerve innervation research suggests psychophysiological and electrical means of treatment.
Does motivational nondirective resonance breathing or transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve heart rate variability and pain intensity in patients with fibromyalgia?
RCT (n=112)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does motivational nondirective resonance breathing or transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve heart rate variability and pain intensity in patients with fibromyalgia?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation techniques (MNRB and tVNS) for treating fibromyalgia.
Protocol for RCT of MNRB and tVNS in fibromyalgia; leaves open whether these techniques improve HRV or pain.
BACKGROUND: Chronic widespread pain (CWP), including fibromyalgia (FM), affects one in every ten adults and is one of the leading causes of sick leave and emotional distress. Due to an unclear etiology and a complex pathophysiology, FM is a condition with few, if any, effective and safe treatments. However, current research within the field of vagal nerve innervation suggests psychophysiological and electrical means by which FM may be treated. This study will investigate the efficacy of two different noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation techniques for the treatment of FM. METHODS: The study will use a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled design to investigate the treatment efficacy of motivational nondirective resonance breathing (MNRB™) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (Nemos® tVNS) on patients diagnosed with FM. Consenting FM patients (N = 112) who are referred to the Department of Pain Management and Research at Oslo University Hospital, in Oslo, Norway, will be randomized into one of four independent groups. Half of these participants (N = 56) will be randomized to either an experimental tVNS group or a sham tVNS group. The other half (N = 56) will be randomized to either an experimental MNRB group or a sham MNRB group. Both active and sham treatment interventions will be delivered twice per day at home, 15 min/morning and 15 min/evening, for a total duration of 2 weeks (14 days). Participants are invited to the clinic twice, once for pre- and once for post-intervention data collection. The primary outcome is changes in photoplethysmography-measured heart rate variability. Secondary outcomes include self-reported pain intensity on a numeric rating scale, changes in pain detection threshold, pain tolerance threshold, and pressure pain limit determined by computerized pressure cuff algometry, blood pressure, and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: The described randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of two vagal nerve innervation interventions, MNRB and tVNS, on heart rate variability and pain intensity in patients suffering from FM. This project tests a new and potentially effective means of treating a major public and global health concern where prevalence is high, disability is severe, and treatment options are limited. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03180554 . Registered on August 06, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paccione et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Fibromyalgia (n=112). Motivational nondirective resonance breathing (MNRB) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) vs. Sham MNRB and Sham tVNS was evaluated on Changes in photoplethysmography-measured heart rate variability (HRV). This is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of motivational nondirective resonance breathing and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in patients with fibromyalgia; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: