Key result
Hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction showed high specificity, with a 6% false negative rate for definite MI and a 97% false negative rate for possible MI compared to WHO criteria.
Why the study?
How accurate is the hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to World Health Organization criteria in patients admitted with suspected MI?
Observational (n=380)
How accurate is the hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to World Health Organization criteria in patients admitted with suspected MI?
Hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction is highly specific and accurate for definite MI, though it frequently misses possible MI, which may not adversely impact short-term in-hospital survival.
Supports hospital diagnoses for definite MI in practice; leaves open standardization of possible MI in research.
The accuracy of diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) was investigated in 380 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with suspected MI. Patients were classified according to World Health Organization criteria as having either definite MI, possible MI, no MI or unclassified through insufficient information. Of 214 patients with definite MI, 202 were diagnosed as MI in the case records (false negative rate 6%). Of 32 patients with possible MI, one was diagnosed as MI in the case records (false negative rate 97%). All 129 patients with MI were correctly diagnosed in the case records. Five patients were unclassified. MI was therefore diagnosed with high specificity. A correct diagnosis in the group with possible MI may not be essential for optimal hospital management, since no deaths occurred in these patients and most were not monitored in hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian Craig (1982) conducted an observational in Suspected myocardial infarction (n=380). Hospital diagnosis vs. World Health Organization criteria was evaluated on Accuracy of diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction showed high specificity, with a 6% false negative rate for definite MI and a 97% false negative rate for possible MI compared to WHO criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: