Key result
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting may negatively impact outcomes of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting, though definitive conclusions remain controversial.
Why the study?
Does prior coronary stenting compromise the outcomes of future coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)?
Does prior coronary stenting compromise the outcomes of future coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)?
Prior PCI may negatively impact the outcomes of subsequent CABG, particularly with higher stent loads, though definitive conclusions are still lacking.
There has been a tremendous growth in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with stent implantation, even in cases where coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) demonstrates superior long-term results – the cases of multivessel coronary disease. With the number of PCIs on the rise, one may expect a growing population of patients with prior PCI to be ultimately referred to CABG as a result of long-term PCI failure, incomplete revascularization or disease progression. It has been suggested that previous PCI might be considered as a risk factor with a negative impact on subsequent CABG procedure. Several large observational studies found that multiple previous coronary stenting has a negative effect on the outcome of a subsequent surgical revascularization – the higher the stent load the worse the outcome. Nevertheless, no definitive conclusion can be made at this point, as this issue is still a matter of significant controversy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazar Velicki (2013) conducted a review in Multivessel coronary disease. Prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting was evaluated on Outcome of subsequent surgical revascularization (CABG). Prior percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting may negatively impact outcomes of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting, though definitive conclusions remain controversial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Interventional Cardiology