Key result
Prior coronary stenting before isolated CABG was associated with more postoperative complications and diminished 60-month survival in patients with more than three stents (72.6% vs 82.1% for no stents).
Why the study?
Does prior coronary stenting affect the immediate and mid-term outcomes of isolated CABG?
Cohort (n=1,471)
No
Does prior coronary stenting affect the immediate and mid-term outcomes of isolated CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.6% vs 82.1%
Prior coronary stenting, particularly with more than three stents, is associated with higher postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and potentially diminished long-term survival following isolated CABG.
May warrant caution in patients with >3 prior stents before CABG; leaves open whether stent burden causally affects outcomes, needing prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: : There has been little emphasis on the possible consequences of prior stent placement on the outcome of coronary bypass surgery (CABG). We compared the results of isolated CABG patients who had prior stents with those who had not with respect to preoperative status, operative procedure, and postoperative immediate and long-term outcome. METHODS: : Records of 1471 patients undergoing isolated CABG at our institution between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2005, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups. Group I had no stents (n = 1317). Group II had one to three stents (n = 137). Group III had more than three stents (n = 17). Groups were compared with respect to preoperative risk factors, operative procedures, and postoperative results. Long-term survival data were obtained on 97.6% of patients with a mean follow-up, 4.1 ± 2.3 years. RESULTS: : Stented patients were younger (66.1 ± 10.8 vs. 69.1 ± 10.8 years, P = 0.006), had more unstable angina (68.2% vs. 58.9%, P = 0.02), hypercholesterolemia (83.8% vs. 61.2%, P = 0.00), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13.6% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.03), peripheral vascular disease (15.2% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.00), and previous CABG (10.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.00), fewer low ejection fractions (1.3% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.02), left main disease (25.3% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.04), diabetes (31.2% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.01), or diffuse disease (19.5 ± 10.5 vs. 22.5 ± 10.9, P = 0.00), had more off pump procedures (53.2% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.03), fewer internal thoracic artery grafts (80.5% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.03), fewer grafts placed (>3: 52.6% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.02), more complications (76.5% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.005), atrial fibrillation (47.1% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.011), longer hospital stays (12.2 vs. 8.3 days, P = 0.019). Percentage survival for groups I, II, and III at 60 months was 82.1%, 84.7%, and 72.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : Stents placed before surgery in isolated CABG patients may be associated with higher preoperative risk, altered operative procedures, more postoperative complications, longer hospitalizations, and more readmissions. Overall, stented patients experienced more preoperative hospitalizations, catheterizations, and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) than nonstented patients. Survival for those with more than three stents may be diminished.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pliam et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) (n=1,471). Prior coronary stenting vs. No prior stents was evaluated on Survival at 60 months. Prior coronary stenting before isolated CABG was associated with more postoperative complications and diminished 60-month survival in patients with more than three stents (72.6% vs 82.1% for no stents).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: