Key result
Transradial intervention should be considered as the primary approach for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients due to fewer bleeding complications, if operators are experienced.
Why the study?
Does transradial coronary intervention improve safety and reduce bleeding complications compared to transfemoral intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does transradial coronary intervention improve safety and reduce bleeding complications compared to transfemoral intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
This editorial advocates for transradial access as the primary approach for emergency PCI in STEMI to reduce bleeding complications, provided operators are experienced.
n the first case of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), reported by Dr Gruntzig in 1978, the transfemoral approach was used.Since then, many interventional cardiologists have performed PCI using that approach.However, in the history of cardiac catheterization, the first case was performed by a urologist Dr Forssmann, from his own brachial vein to the right side of his heart in 1929, for which he received a Nobel Prize because he opened the gate to cardiac catheterization.Dr Sones started coronary diagnostic catheterization via the brachial artery in 1960, so catheterization from the upper limb is quite an old idea.Following Dr Sones, Dr Judkins started transfemoral coronary diagnostic catheterization using a catheter that he had designed for easy engagement in the coronary artery, and the transfemoral approach using the "Judkins technique" became the standard technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuji Ikari (2009) conducted an editorial in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Transradial Coronary Intervention (TRI) vs. Transfemoral Intervention (TFI) was evaluated. Transradial intervention should be considered as the primary approach for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients due to fewer bleeding complications, if operators are experienced.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: