Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the modifications of the long-duration response to levodopa in PD over a 1-year period. BACKGROUND: The development of predictable motor fluctuations in PD has been attributed mainly to modifications over time of the short-duration response to levodopa, whereas the role of the long-duration response has not been widely investigated. METHODS: In 17 patients with PD the authors examined prospectively both the short-duration response and the long-duration response to levodopa under standardized conditions on two different occasions separated by a period of approximately 1 year (11.7 +/- 3.6 months). RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, the short-duration response increased in magnitude but did not change significantly in duration. A total of 24% of patients lost the long-duration response 1 year after their first examination, but a sustained long-duration response could be reestablished by shortening the interdose interval for levodopa intake. Moreover, the duration of the long-duration response after discontinuation of treatment became significantly shorter during 1 year. CONCLUSION: Modifications of the long-duration response may have a pivotal role in generating a fluctuating response, and suggest that therapeutic strategies based on maintenance of the long-duration response should be sought to avoid the appearance of motor fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zappia et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: