Key result
Pulsatile perfusion augmented gaseous micro-emboli number at the venous postpump site compared to nonpulsatile perfusion, but mean volume remained comparable.
Why the study?
Does pulsatile perfusion increase gaseous micro-emboli production and delivery compared to nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in adults?
RCT (n=24)
No
Does pulsatile perfusion increase gaseous micro-emboli production and delivery compared to nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in adults?
Pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass increases micro-emboli numbers post-pump by splitting existing bubbles, but an effective oxygenator and arterial filter ensures no difference in emboli reaching the patient compared to nonpulsatile flow.
Pulsatile perfusion may increase post-pump micro-emboli counts without changing volume; leaves open whether filters mitigate clinical risk in cardiopulmonary bypass.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has a risk of cerebral injury, with an important role of gaseous micro-emboli (GME) coming from the CPB circuit. Pulsatile perfusion is supposed to perform specific conditions for supplementary GME activity. We aimed to determine whether pulsatile CPB augments production and delivery of GME and evaluate the role of different events in GME activity during either type of perfusion. Twenty-four patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery at the University of Verona were divided equally into two groups-pulsatile perfusion (PP) group and nonpulsatile perfusion (NP) group. The circuit included a JostraHL-20 roller pump set in pulsatile or nonpulsatile mode, an open Sorin Synthesis membrane oxygenator with integrated screen-type arterial filter, and phosphorylcholine-coated tubes. Hemodynamic flow evaluation was performed in terms of energy equivalent pressure and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE). GME were counted by means of a GAMPT BCC200 bubble counter (GAMPT, Zappendorf, Germany) with two probes placed at postpump and postarterial filter positions. Results were evaluated in terms of GME number, GME volume, number of over-ranged GME from both probes, and series of filtering indexes. In PP mode, the pump produced and delivered along the circuit significantly higher amounts of SHE than in NP mode. At the venous postpump site, GME number was significantly higher during PP but no difference was found in terms of GME volume or number of over-ranged bubbles. No significant difference in GME number, GME volume, or number of over-ranges was found at the postarterial filter site. Filtering indexes were similar between the two groups. Neither type of perfusion was shown to contribute to excessive GME production during the most important perfusionist manipulation. Pulsatility leads to GME increment by splitting and size diminishing of the existing bubbles but not by additional gas production. PP augmented GME number at the venous postpump site, while mean volume remained comparable with NP. Sorin Synthesis oxygenator showed high efficacy in GME removal during either type of perfusion. Supplementary GME production and delivery during typical perfusionist manipulations did not depend on perfusion type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodonov et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease requiring bypass grafting (n=24). Pulsatile perfusion vs. Nonpulsatile perfusion was evaluated on Gaseous micro-emboli (GME) number, volume, and number of over-ranged GME. Pulsatile perfusion augmented gaseous micro-emboli number at the venous postpump site compared to nonpulsatile perfusion, but mean volume remained comparable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: