Key result
This editorial discusses strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death in athletes, noting that mandatory preparticipation screening is based on observational data and expert opinion.
Why the study?
Do preparticipation screening and automated external defibrillators prevent sudden cardiac death in young athletes?
Do preparticipation screening and automated external defibrillators prevent sudden cardiac death in young athletes?
The editorial emphasizes that while preparticipation screening and AEDs are complementary strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death in athletes, the evidence for mandatory screening remains observational.
The sudden, unexpected demise of an athlete is a devastating event that invariably leads to calls for prevention. In this edition of the journal, Corrado and colleagues provide an overview of strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death during sports.1 Timely identification of asymptomatic athletes at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (finding the needle in the haystack) or prompt resuscitation efforts with the use of an automated external defibrillator if an athlete suffers a cardiac arrest (closing the barn door) are two complementary strategies. The former strategy is largely based on the Italian practice of mandatory preparticipation screening of young athletes (aged 35 years or younger) launched in 1982. The latter strategy is addressed in the pioneering work of Drezner, co-author of Corrado et al.1 The Italian experience, which has provided the sports medicine community with a wealth of information on different cardiologic aspects of (intense) training, forms the basis for the 2005 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus statement that essentially recommends routine preparticipation screening of young athletes.2 As such these recommendations are based on information from a population-based, observational study and expert opinion, which would qualify the level of scientific evidence for this intervention (mandatory preparticipation screening) as Class II B (usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion) and level of evidence C. This view is reflected in the 2007 American Heart Association scientific statement ‘Exercise and Acute Cardiovascular Events, placing the risks into perspective’: ‘… other strategies, such as screening patients before participation in exercise… appear prudent, but have not been systematically evaluated’.3 Professor Corrado is one of the authors of this statement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mosterd et al. (2011) conducted an editorial in Sudden cardiac death in athletes. Preparticipation screening and automated external defibrillators was evaluated. This editorial discusses strategies to prevent sudden cardiac death in athletes, noting that mandatory preparticipation screening is based on observational data and expert opinion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: