Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Albira Trimodal pre-clinical scanner comprises PET, SPECT and CT sub-systems and thus provides a range of pre-clinical imaging options. The PET component consists of three rings of single-crystal LYSO detectors with axial/transverse fields-of-view (FOVs) of 148/80 mm. The SPECT component has two opposing CsI detectors (100 × 100 mm2) with single-pinhole (SPH) or multi(9)-pinhole (MPH) collimators; the detectors rotate in 6° increments and their spacing can be adjusted to provide different FOVs (25 to 120 mm). The CT sub-system provides 'low' (200 µA, 35 kVp) or 'high' (400 µA, 45 kVp) power x-rays onto a flat-panel CsI detector. This study examines the performance characteristics and quantitative accuracy of the PET and SPECT components. Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 specifications (22Na point source), the PET spatial resolution is 1.5 + 0.1 mm on axis and sensitivity 6.3% (axial centre) and 4.6% (central 70 mm). The usable activity range is ≤ 10 MBq (18F) over which good linearity (within 5%) is obtained for a uniform cylinder spanning the axial FOV; increasing deviation from linearity with activity is, however, observed for the NEMA (mouse) line source phantom. Image uniformity axially is within 5%. Spatial resolution (SPH/MPH) for the minimum SPECT FOV used for mouse imaging (50 mm) is 1.5/1.7 mm and point source sensitivity 69/750 cps MBq–1. Axial uniformity of SPECT images (%CV of regions-of-interest counts along the axis) is mostly within 8% although there is a range of 30–40% for the largest FOV. The variation is significantly smaller within the central 40 mm. Instances of count rate nonlinearity (PET) and axial non-uniformity (SPECT) were found to be reproducible and thus amenable to empirical correction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spinks et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: