The drying kinetics and detailed phytochemical profile of broccoli under microwave drying (500 and 900 W) and air-borne ultrasound (125.2 and 180.1 W/dm2) assisted air drying at 70 °C were compared. The results show that, together with the faster drying speed, microwave performed better than ultrasound for the protection of chlorophylls and ascorbic acid. On the other hand, ultrasound-dried broccoli samples showed higher contents of carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, α-carotene, and β-carotene), glucosinolates (glucoraphanin, glucobrassicin, and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin), and sulforaphane compared to the microwave-dried samples. The contents of lutein, glucoraphanin, glucobrassicin, and sulforaphane in the ultrasound-dried samples at 180.1 W/dm2 were 56.5%, 13.7%, 24.9%, and 53.0% higher than that in microwave-dried samples at 900 W. Taking the aforementioned results and literature survey into consideration, it can be concluded that microwave drying has a higher drying efficiency, whereas ultrasound-assisted drying could be a better technology for the preservation of phytochemicals in fruits and vegetables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: