Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The formation energies and the binding energies of divacancies in bcc Li are calculated using the ab initio electron theory in a supercell approach. The results show that the activation energy for self-diffusion via divacancies should be much larger than that for self-diffusion via monovacancies. This is in contrast to the case for an analysis of the experimental self-diffusion data from the nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation rates in terms of a combined monovacancy-divacancy mechanism which would yield similar activation energies for monovacancies and divacancies. It is therefore concluded that a contribution from divacancies cannot explain the observed curvature of the Arrhenius plot for the self-diffusion data for Li at high temperatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schott et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: