This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the photothermal therapy (PTT) performances of single gold (Au), single magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), and Au@Fe 3 O 4 and Fe 3 O 4 @Au core–shell nanoparticles using PyMieLab and COMSOL Multiphysics simulations. Through a detailed parametric study, we elucidate how core–shell configurations influence photothermal conversion efficiency, heat generation, and spatial temperature distribution. Our results reveal that Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles exhibit a higher intrinsic photothermal efficiency than Au; however, integrating both materials in core–shell structures markedly enhances thermal responses, with Fe 3 O 4 @Au consistently outperforming Au@Fe 3 O 4 . This enhancement arises from synergistic core–shell interactions that optimize light absorption and thermal conversion. A Gaussian process regression (GPR)-based efficiency parameter was introduced to predict optimal geometric combinations and temperature profiles. The analysis revealed clear design rules; the effective shell thicknesses ranged from 10 to 30 nm, while the most efficient core radius was around 80 nm. The highest predicted temperature elevations occurred at a 4:1 core-to-shell ratio, although the largest J o values were observed at a ratio of 5:1. Among the optical parameters, the absorption cross-section ( C abs ) had the strongest influence on the photothermal performance, while J o, despite its limited predictive reliability in the current data set, remains a promising descriptor for future studies with broader material combinations. These findings underscore the pivotal role of nanoparticle design in PTT optimization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akyuz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: