Key result
Poor warfarin control (time in therapeutic range <65%) was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism (HR 2.26) compared to TTR ≥65% in elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does renal dysfunction affect anticoagulation control with warfarin and clinical outcomes in elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=2,782)
Yes
Does renal dysfunction affect anticoagulation control with warfarin and clinical outcomes in elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 2.26 (95% CI 1.37–3.72)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=0.001
In elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, severe renal dysfunction (CrCl <30 mL/min) is associated with poor warfarin control, and both are independent predictors of all-cause death and composite adverse events.
Severe renal dysfunction and low TTR flag high-risk elderly Japanese NVAF patients on warfarin; hypothesis-generating for whether optimizing control improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether renal dysfunction affects warfarin control in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a dataset from the J-RHYTHM Registry, time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) were determined in elderly patients aged ≥70 years. Target INR values were 1.6-2.6 following Japanese guidelines. Incidences of thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death were determined over 2 years. Of 7,406 NVAF patients enrolled in the registry, 2,782 elderly patients (mean age, 75 years) had data for CrCl measured at baseline and TTR. TTR values were lower in the lower CrCl groups (P<0.001 for trend). CrCl <30 mL/min was independently associated with TTR <65% (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.95; P=0.004). In the multivariate analysis, TTR <65% was independently associated with thromboembolism (hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-3.72; P=0.001), but CrCl was not (CrCl <30 mL/min, 1.68, 0.41-6.85, P=0.473). However, CrCl <30 mL/min and TTR <65% were independently associated with all-cause death (5.32, 1.56-18.18, P=0.008 and 1.60, 1.07-2.38, P=0.022, respectively) and the composite event (thromboembolism, major hemorrhage and all-cause death) (2.03, 1.10-3.76, P=0.024 and 1.58, 1.22-2.04, P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly NVAF patients with renal dysfunction had poor warfarin control, which was associated with higher risk of thromboembolism and all-cause death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=2,782). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) <65% vs. TTR ≥65% was evaluated on Thromboembolism (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.37-3.72, p=0.001). Poor warfarin control (time in therapeutic range <65%) was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism (HR 2.26) compared to TTR ≥65% in elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: