Why the study?
Does warfarin therapy reduce thromboembolic events in very old patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does warfarin therapy reduce thromboembolic events in very old patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Warfarin therapy provides clinical benefit in very old patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation when the INR is strictly maintained between 1.6 and 2.59.
May support lower INR targets in AF patients ≥85; leaves open randomized confirmation of net benefit.
BACKGROUND: To clarify the effects of warfarin therapy in very old patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), a post-hoc analysis was performed using the data of the J-RHYTHM Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A consecutive series of AF outpatients was enrolled from 158 institutions. Of 7,937 patients, 7,406 with NVAF (men, 70.8%; 69.8±10.0 years) were followed for 2 years or until an event occurred. Patients were divided into 3 age groups (<70, 70-84, and ≥85 years) and 5 subgroups according to international normalized ratio (INR; <1.6, 1.6-1.99, 2.0-2.59, 2.6-2.99, and ≥3.0). Prevalence of female sex, permanent AF, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and history of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack was higher in the older groups. In the oldest group, 79.7% of patients received warfarin and their time in therapeutic range, using the Japanese target INR of 1.6-2.6, was 67.1%. Rate of thromboembolic events was lower in the age groups <70 and 70-84 years (P=0.027 and P<0.001, respectively) for patients receiving warfarin compared with those who were not. In the oldest group, the rate of thromboembolism plus major hemorrhage was lower at INR 1.6-2.59. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin could have beneficial effects even in very old NVAF patients if INR is kept between 1.6 and 2.59.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kodani et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: