Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aimed to evaluate and compare two types of internal fixation, locking angular plate (group 1) and Kirschner-wires (group 2), for post-traumatic cubitus varus. The parameters used were Laupattarakasem's criteria (for range of motion in extension/flexion, correction of carrying angle, and the 'lazy S' deformity) and the Barrett's questionnaire (for patient satisfaction). In group I (plate+screws), we had three excellent results and five good. In group II (Kirschner-wires), we had two good results, three fair, and two poor. Statistical analysis showed a better outcome for group I (plate+screws) considering the correction of the humeral-elbow-wrist angle (P<0.003), the postoperative lateral prominence index (P<0.048), and the patient satisfaction (P<0.011). We recommend the locking angular plate, because it can rigidly stabilize the osteotomy, ensuring an excellent functional and cosmetic outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persiani et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: