Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A family of solid solutions, Cu 5 (Ta 1– x Nb x ) 11 O 30 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4), was investigated as p-type semiconductors for their band gaps and energies and for their activity for the reduction of water to molecular hydrogen. Compositions from 0 to 40 mol % niobium were prepared in high purity by solid-state methods, accompanied by only very small increases in the lattice parameters of ∼0.05% and with the niobium and tantalum cations disordered over the same atomic sites. However, an increasing niobium content causes a significant decrease in the bandgap size from ∼2.58 to ∼2.05 eV owing to the decreasing conduction band energies. Linear-sweep voltammetry showed an increase in cathodic photocurrents with niobium content and applied negative potential of up to −0.6 mA/cm 2 (pH ∼7.3; AM 1.5 G light filter with an irradiation intensity of ∼100 mW/cm 2 ). The cathodic photocurrents could be partially stabilized by heating the polycrystalline films in air at 550 °C for 1 h to produce surface nanoislands of CuO or using protecting layers of aluminum-doped zinc oxide and titania. Aqueous suspensions of the Cu 5 (Ta 1– x Nb x ) 11 O 30 powders were also found to be active for hydrogen production under visible-light irradiation in a 20% aqueous methanol solution with the highest apparent quantum yields for the 10% and 20% Nb-substituted samples. Electronic structure calculations show that the increased photocurrents and hydroen evolution activities of the solid solutions arise near the percolation threshold of the niobate/tantalate framework wherein the Nb cations establish an extended −O–Nb–O–Nb–O– diffusion pathway for the minority carriers. The latter also reveals a novel pathway for enhancing charge separation as a function of the niobium–oxide connectivity. Thus, these results illustrate the advantages of using solid solutions to achieve the smaller bandgap sizes and band energies that are needed for solar-driven photocatalytic reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoellner et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: