Key result
Ever use of complementary and alternative medicine was reported by 41% of patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, with alternative medicine systems being the most common type (83.3%).
Why the study?
For resource-limited countries managing major noncommunicable diseases, an integrated approach is important, but the prevalence, pattern, and predictors of CAM use in patients with diabetes or hypertension were unclear.
What is the prevalence, pattern, and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with diabetes and hypertension?
Cross-Sectional
Yes
What is the prevalence, pattern, and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with diabetes and hypertension?
A significant proportion (41%) of patients with diabetes and hypertension in Rishikesh, India, use complementary and alternative medicine, highlighting the need for integrated healthcare approaches.
CAM use common among diabetes/hypertension patients; leaves open questions on safety, efficacy, and integration with standard care.
Introduction: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have emerged as a pandemic globally and the situation is worse for developing nations. The four major NCDs that are responsible for a major proportion of mortality across the globe are cardiovascular diseases, cancer, respiratory diseases, and diabetes. For a country with limited resources, an integrated approach toward the management of NCDs is of particular importance. Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are those health-care and medical practices that are not currently an integral part of conventional medicine system. This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence, pattern, and predictors of CAM use among patients with NCDs (diabetes, hypertension, or both). Materials and Methods: A health-facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at different levels of government health-care facilities in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand. CAM categories included alternative medical systems, mind–body intervention, biologically based therapies, manipulative and body-based methods, and energy therapies. Additionally, jhaad phook/local healers were also included in our study. Results: The study showed that 41% of all the study participants were ever users of CAM. While most of the users were practicing more than one type of CAM, the most common type of CAM practiced was alternative medicine system (83.3%) followed by mind–body medicine (40.2%). Except religion and place of residence of the study participant, no other factor showed a significant association with ever usage of CAM. Conclusion: CAM use was popular among study participants as almost half of them were using/consuming it and alternative medicine system was the most common type of CAM practiced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walia et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes, hypertension, or both. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) was evaluated on Prevalence of ever use of CAM. Ever use of complementary and alternative medicine was reported by 41% of patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, with alternative medicine systems being the most common type (83.3%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: