Key result
Diabetes did not increase the 30-day rate of stroke, ischemic cardiopathy, and death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing endovascular treatment.
Why the study?
Does diabetes worsen 30-day and long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques?
Cohort (n=318)
Does diabetes worsen 30-day and long-term outcomes in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques?
Diabetes does not significantly increase the risk of 30-day or long-term morbidity, mortality, or restenosis in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetes does not appear to raise 30-day risk after carotid stenting; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The influence of diabetes on carotid revascularization techniques is controversial, with few data regarding angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Our purpose was to analyze whether its presence constitutes a risk factor for poor outcome of patients with carotid stenosis treated with CAS. METHODS: We compared 30-day and long term morbidity and mortality, as well as restenosis rates, of non diabetic and diabetic patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques. RESULTS: 318 consecutive patients, 116 (36.5%) of them diabetics, were followed for a median of 56 months. Cumulative 30-day stroke, ischemic cardiopathy and death rate was 4% for non diabetics and 5.2% for diabetics (non significant). Long term stroke and mortality rate was 26.4% for the first group and 34.3% for the second (non significant). The most frequent causes of death were myocardial infarction (17.5% non diabetics, 44% diabetics, p = 0.04), ischemic stroke (12.5% non diabetics, 4% diabetics, non significant) and cancer (30% non diabetics, 16% diabetics, non significant). Twelve patients (6.4%) had restenosis ≥ 50%, 5.9% non diabetic, 7.4% diabetic, also without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, endovascular treatment is both efficient and safe in diabetic patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis; therefore, the presence of diabetes mellitus did not increase the risks linked to CAS procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lago et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic carotid stenosis (n=318). Diabetes mellitus vs. Non-diabetic was evaluated on Cumulative 30-day stroke, ischemic cardiopathy and death (p=non significant). Diabetes did not increase the 30-day rate of stroke, ischemic cardiopathy, and death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing endovascular treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: