Key result
Showing patients the video of their elective percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced their anxiety scores compared to the control group (change in score -9.86 vs -6.86, p=0.033).
Why the study?
Coronary angioplasty can cause significant anxiety and impact mental health, prompting evaluation of whether showing post-PCI angiogram videos alters illness perception and anxiety.
Does showing angiograms to patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention reduce anxiety and improve illness perception?
RCT (n=60)
Single-blind
Simple selection
No
Does showing angiograms to patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention reduce anxiety and improve illness perception?
Absolute Event Rate: -9.86% vs -6.86%
p-value: p=0.033
Showing patients their angiogram videos after elective percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces anxiety and improves illness perception.
Supports routine angiogram video review after elective PCI to reduce anxiety; extends evidence on visual aids for illness perception.
Background: As an invasive modality, a coronary angioplasty may cause a great deal of anxiety in patients and affect their mental health and general well-being. Accordingly, we sought to assess whether showing patients the video of their elective percutaneous coronary intervention (angiogram) could affect their illness perception and anxiety level. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, the patients undergoing angioplasty, were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients. Angiograms were shown only to the intervention group postprocedurally. A checklist comprising demographic data and clinical presentations as well as the Beck anxiety questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) was completed for each patient immediately after the intervention and one month later. The differences in the patients’ anxiety level and illness perception were analyzed. Results: In the intervention group, the mean anxiety score before and after watching the angiograms was 34.26 ± 8.1 and 24.4 ± 8.56, respectively. While in the control group, the score before and after angioplasty was 34.46 ± 9.34 and 26.6 ± 9.44, respectively. Thus, watching angiograms led to a significant decrease in the anxiety score in the intervention group, whereas there was no such difference in the control group. There was also a considerable difference in the anxiety score between the two groups. Further, there was a significant decrease in the BIPQ score of the intervention group after watching the angioplasty videos. Conclusion: Educating cardiovascular patients about diagnostic and therapeutic procedures may confer such good outcomes as alleviated anxiety, enhanced satisfaction, and ultimately, fewer anxiety-related complications. [GMJ.2019;8:e1556]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalalsafari et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease requiring elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=60). Showing the video of their elective percutaneous coronary intervention (angiogram) vs. Standard care (verbal explanation only) was evaluated on Change in Beck anxiety score (p=0.033). Showing patients the video of their elective percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced their anxiety scores compared to the control group (change in score -9.86 vs -6.86, p=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: