Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of mono- and poly-antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in a cohort of nursing home (NH) residents and to describe specific AED combinations used, as well as demographic, clinical, and functional factors associated with poly-AED therapy and the most common AED combination. DESIGN: Retrospective, point prevalence study. SETTING: All NHs owned/managed by Beverly Enterprises. PARTICIPANTS: All residents aged 65 and older residing in one of the study NHs on July 1, 1999, and receiving an AED (N=3,881). MEASUREMENTS: Data were gathered using two secondary source data sets: physicians' orders (AED use) and the Minimum Data Set (health status indicators). RESULTS: Of residents taking AEDs, 370 (9.5%) were taking two or more; 268 of those (72%) were taking problematic AED combinations (those with the potential of undesirable pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions). Phenytoin (PHT) with phenobarbital (PB) was the most common combination (27.0%). Logistic regression indicated that poly-AED subjects were more likely to have a diagnosis of epilepsy/seizure (epi/sz) and less likely to have a diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Residents taking the PHT/PB combination were more likely to have an epi/sz diagnosis and longer NH stay. The association between CVA and PHT/PB polytherapy differed by presence or absence of aphasia. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of poly-AED therapy is less than 10% in NH residents, but 72% of those residents were receiving problematic polytherapy combinations, thereby exposing them to potential risk of adverse reactions and toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harms et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: