Current osteoarthritis (OA) management remains largely symptom-directed, while the contribution of osteoporosis (OP)-related and OA-associated subchondral remodeling to disease heterogeneity remains uncertain. This review integrates macroscopic load redistribution and lower-limb malalignment with local osteoimmune processes, including macrophage-state heterogeneity, Th17/Treg imbalance, senescence-associated secretory signaling, and bone–vascular coupling. We propose a bidirectional, phenotype-dependent framework in which abnormal loading may initiate compartment-specific subchondral remodeling, whereas high-turnover bone loss may reduce trabecular competence and amplify stress concentration; late OA may instead exhibit a low-turnover sclerotic phenotype. Existing evidence supports biological links among bone remodeling, inflammatory signaling, and osteochondral crosstalk but does not establish that anti-osteoporotic therapy reverses malalignment or consistently modifies OA progression. Bone-targeting treatment should therefore be considered a hypothesis requiring turnover- and phenotype-stratified clinical evaluation. The proposed time-window model is intended to organize future studies rather than provide current treatment recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: