Key result
Patients with high preoperative and high met expectations had increased odds of achieving a completely better status compared to those with low preoperative and low met expectations (OR 5.17, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations independently influence patient-reported outcomes, but their combined effect was not well understood.
Does the combination of preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations predict patient-reported outcomes after non-arthroplasty knee surgery?
Cohort (n=638)
No
Does the combination of preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations predict patient-reported outcomes after non-arthroplasty knee surgery?
Odds Ratio: 5.17
p-value: p=<0.001
Postoperative met expectations are a stronger predictor of patient-reported outcomes than preoperative expectations in non-arthroplasty knee surgery.
Met expectations may outweigh preoperative ones for PROs after non-arthroplasty knee surgery; leaves open whether targeted expectation management improves outcomes.
Introduction: Both preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations can independently influence patient-reported outcomes (PROs), however, their combined effect on PROs is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of categorizing non-arthroplasty knee surgery patients into clusters based on both preoperative expectations and postoperative met expectations. Methods: 638 patients who underwent non-arthroplasty knee surgery from June 2015 to May 2021 at a single academic institution were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on both preoperative expectations and two-year postoperative met expectations scores using cluster analysis. Four distinct expectations cluster groups were formed: high preoperative-high met expectations (HIGH-HIGH), low preoperative-high met expectations (LOW-HIGH), high preoperative-low met expectations (HIGH-LOW), and low preoperative-low met expectations (LOW-LOW). Socioeconomic data and PROs were compared based on cluster group, and logistic regression was performed to determine the likelihood of achieving a patient-perceived "completely better" status based on cluster group. Results: Patients with high met expectations, regardless of preoperative expectations, reported better two-year PROs compared to patients with low met expectations. Patients with high preoperative expectations achieved better outcomes only when those expectations were met postoperatively. Low preoperative expectations did not preclude patients from achieving good outcomes, as long as those expectations were met. The HIGH-HIGH group had increased odds of achieving completely better status compared to the LOW-HIGH group (OR = 1.68, p = .02), HIGH-LOW group (OR = 16.69, p < .001), and LOW-LOW group (OR = 5.17, p < .001). The HIGH-LOW group had decreased odds of achieving completely better status compared to the LOW-LOW group (OR = .31, p = .01). Conclusion: Met expectations may be a stronger predictor of postoperative outcomes than preoperative expectations in non-arthroplasty knee surgery. This study highlights the importance of setting realistic preoperative expectations and focusing on achieving expectations postoperatively. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians to manage patient expectations effectively based on individual characteristics and expected treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Non-arthroplasty knee surgery (n=638). High preoperative and high met expectations (HIGH-HIGH) vs. Low preoperative and low met expectations (LOW-LOW) was evaluated on Patient-perceived 'completely better' status (OR 5.17, p=<0.001). Patients with high preoperative and high met expectations had increased odds of achieving a completely better status compared to those with low preoperative and low met expectations (OR 5.17, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: