Key result
Videophotoplethysmography correctly identified instantaneous sympathovagal changes and complex dynamics during resting state compared to ECG, though differences emerged during postural changes.
Why the study?
Does videophotoplethysmography (vPPG) accurately measure instantaneous linear, nonlinear and complex cardiovascular dynamics compared to standard ECG in young healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Does videophotoplethysmography (vPPG) accurately measure instantaneous linear, nonlinear and complex cardiovascular dynamics compared to standard ECG in young healthy subjects?
Videophotoplethysmography shows promise for non-contact assessment of cardiovascular dynamics at rest, though accuracy decreases during postural changes compared to standard ECG.
vPPG may enable non-contact resting dynamics assessment; leaves open reliability during postural changes, requiring validation.
BACKGROUND: There is a fast growing interest in the use of non-contact devices for health and performance assessment in humans. In particular, the use of non-contact videophotoplethysmography (vPPG) has been recently demonstrated as a feasible way to extract cardiovascular information. Nevertheless, proper validation of vPPG-derived heartbeat dynamics is still missing. OBJECTIVE: We aim to an in-depth validation of time-varying, linear and nonlinear/complex dynamics of the pulse rate variability extracted from vPPG. METHODS: We apply inhomogeneous pointprocess nonlinear models to assess instantaneous measures defined in the time, frequency, and bispectral domains as estimated through vPPG and standard ECG. Instantaneous complexity measures, such as the instantaneous Lyapunov exponents and the recently defined inhomogeneous point-process approximate and sample entropy, were estimated as well. Video recordings were processed using our recently proposed method based on zerophase principal component analysis. Experimental data were gathered from 60 young healthy subjects (age: 24±3 years) undergoing postural changes (rest-to-stand maneuver). RESULTS: Group averaged results show that there is an overall agreement between linear and nonlinear/complexity indices computed from ECG and vPPG during resting state conditions. However, important differences are found, particularly in the bispectral and complexity domains, in recordings where the subjects has been instructed to stand up. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant differences exist between cardiovascular estimates from vPPG and ECG, it is very promising that instantaneous sympathovagal changes, as well as time-varying complex dynamics, were correctly identified, especially during resting state. In addition to a further improvement of the video signal quality, more research is advocated towards a more precise estimation of cardiovascular dynamics by a comprehensive nonlinear/complex paradigm specifically tailored to the non-contact quantification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iozzia et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=60). Videophotoplethysmography (vPPG) vs. Standard ECG was evaluated on Instantaneous measures defined in the time, frequency, and bispectral domains, and complexity measures. Videophotoplethysmography correctly identified instantaneous sympathovagal changes and complex dynamics during resting state compared to ECG, though differences emerged during postural changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: